Wits University
Online Journalism Assignment
Student: Ntandoyenkosi Ncube
Definition: New media is Online and digital ways of send, receiving and manipulating information. It came with emergence of digital, computerized, or networked information and communication technologies. It takes advantage of interactive digital media, such as the Internet, as opposed to traditional media such as print and television.
It is digital revolution of information dissemination.
“We didn’t think it was important. It was a serious misjudgment…We thought that the newspapers, the print media, the television were important but young people were looking at test messages and blogs’’, commented former Malaysia Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad on the BN loss in the general elections
He concluded by admitting that the influence of new media “was painful’’.
The success of US President Barack Obama is an example of a politician who utilised new media in order to motivate masses of people to attend rallies and show support for him online. His rival, John McCain did not even have a new media strategy (as far as I know).
The Sunday Morning Herald journalist Ruth Pollard during my interview with her said-“For journalists, the future is new media. We either embrace it or our profession dies. We can no longer say that newspaper reporting or television and radio reporting is the only pure way of reporting – this is no longer true. Great, groundbreaking journalism is happening online and unless professional journalists who are trained and educated in the legal and ethical minefield of reporting take up space on online news sites, we will be simply leaving that space to the untrained bloggers and “citizen journalists” who have none of the ethics, training and editorial support that comes with a proper newsroom.
New media provides professional journalists with many new ways of telling a story and connecting with our readers and viewers. We should see this as an opportunity, not as a threat. Our online news reports can use audio, video and photographs of the experts we quote and the talent we use, bringing a human face to our stories and allowing our readers and viewers to see a new dimension to our reporting.”
Looking at new media, it is easy to see that there are some powerful forces driving change across our cultural, our social and even our political landscapes.
With the new media emerging it has come clear that: There is a struggle to revise the social and legal norms especially in relation to intellectual property. Experts are coming under increasing pressure from new voices who are adopters of new technology. New organisations are emerging to deal with the social, cultural and political package of lives. The concepts of identity and community are transformed. New forms of language come into being.
The Impact of New Media considers the influence of digital revolution and how technological forms such as computers, online courses and interactive material change the evaluation of news writing and social and human character.
It takes a stance on how the advent innovative communication gadgets and systems has revolutionised the mind of the old and the young generation.
It takes a look on how the old standards of journalism and media have responded, benefited or been affected the modern technology.
It takes a reading on how professional journalists and ordinary individuals have reacted to new technology in terms of disseminating news and information.
Undisputed is the fact that new media has colossal impact to the mainstream media and global village since it is technology based and it’s all about the message, not the medium and it doesn’t have standards.
It has both positive negative impacts media and social live.
New communications technology has become a sort of global town hall and has played a part in sharing information and important news otherwise inaccessible through mainstream journalism. It really has given people an opportunity not just to get information but also to share information.
New media has made people to be part of an exchange of information. It engages audiences and really listens to them.
It makes news and information moved at unblockable wave and revolves the world to a tin single village.
Now everyone with access to digital camera, computer and internet is now a “journalist’, can – upload content and publish on any of the several available sites, on own blog or send to a newsroom of choice.
With the advent of new media professional journalism looks “unshaken” but at danger. Common journalisms principals like fairness, objectivity, ethics standards are at risk.
Enforcing ethics and how to tell a growing crowd of non-journalists to abide with these ethics has become ungovernable.
The standards of checking and double-check stories before sending story is vulnerable to new media.
Taking advantage of new media-non journalist personals are now “involved by blogging”, manipulating and abusing, rumors, gossip and hearsays.
Using new media individuals and journalists are creating their own blogs and profiles and generating unique audiences to their sites. It takes less than 20 minutes to teach an individual to open and manage his/her own blog.
Media professionals have mixed feelings on the impact of blogs and social media on reporting but I have a strong feeling they positively impact editorial direction and diversity of reporting, but have a negative impact on quality and accuracy.
New media is changing the gathering, editing, packaging, dissemination and are re-shaping information in a way that was never have imagined possible. One can write and edit from anywhere. By the use of the new media news organisation sub editors do not need to be in the newsroom always.
Omnicom Company and media distribution agency Marketwire interviewed 451 reporters in April last year and revealed journalists have a love-hate relationship with new media. The research proves that 77% of political reporters and 53% of lifestyle reporters said new media had a negative impact on tone.
More than two-thirds (67%) of lifestyle reporters responded that social media had a negative impact on the accuracy of reporting, and 64% said it had a negative impact on quality.
Educators are exposed to many questions than answers when it comes to new media. The new technologies make it easier for people to get information, but does this mean they are really better informed? Are they getting the quality of the surge of information that the new technologies facilitate? This always remains lingering without best answer.
New media readers must be exceptionally cautious about what you read on the web. Where did it come from? What are the motivations of whoever put it there? Can I trust that it’s independent? Can I find it from more than one source?
The danger is that once something is on the internet it spreads fast that expected otherwise by its author.
Although people might criticize the “mainstream media” – newspapers, radio and television as old – you do generally know that news that appears there is being carefully done, edited and fact-checked.
New media facilitates have already taken a major role as an information resource today. Computer technologies such as hypertext and the Internet remove the geographical constrains of print media and allow for a new method of distributing and reading documents.
One of the most important advantages of the new media (computer) over print media is (these) hypertext and hyperlinks.
Hyperlinks not only can help provide informative context to information within a story, they also can help keep a story alive long after its original publication.
It helps readers to branch off and click through to other, more detailed supporting content depending upon a reader’s of interest.
Almost all journalism refers to other source, but online a writer often has the ability to link readers directly to those supporting source.
When the concept of hypertext is applied to the Internet, the reader is still following his interests, but on a global computer network. The geographical location of a document is no longer relevant: the reader may browse documents archived in Africa or Europe and elsewhere in the world that are thematically linked together with hypertext.
Readers and researchers will benefit from networked hypertext, as they must often travel to distant libraries for information.
Information on the Internet is easily accessible, but it is extremely transient. A document on the Internet can be copied, changed, or deleted forever very easily, while a book cannot be revised without reprinting and rebinding a new copy.
On the Internet, one person’s document can be altered and republished by another, and older revisions of documents are rarely saved. This brings up questions of copyright law, which is a great deal harder to enforce on the global Internet than with print media
If the traditional medium recognize and embrace these changes, they can actually thrive in the era of digital journalism. Traditional medium often have a trusted brand, so when you read something from a local newspaper in your country on line you may trust it more than something that comes from a less well-known source.
But traditional media have to become more relevant to people who prefer digital journalism. The traditional media that thrive will be those that embrace these new techniques without giving up the quality journalism they are known for.
New technology has definitely provided people way to share our feelings, our thoughts with others.
In Zimbabwe and many other parts of the world when government banned mainstream and ‘mainstream” independent medium and imposed emergency in the country, people began to comment on their blogs because only news channels were banned but obviously government couldn’t ban the websites as there are millions of bloggers in the country and each of them runs more than one blog.
In a democracy system, the rights to criticize government without interference regarded as fundamental principal of freedom of speech and this is jurisdictions use by bloggers to fully utilize the new media due to less censorship.
Political Blogs are unique in the sense that they do not fall under a collective umbrella of some media tycoons or political influence such as Ted Turner and Rupert Murdoch or our country’s political pressures. Each blog represents the voice of an individual with no queen in the hive acting as central command.
The existence of Internet has turned it into a political force by itself. According to University Malaya Media Department lecturer, Dr Abu Hassan Hasbullah, his research shows that 70% of the recent general election results were influence by information in political blogs.
Prominent socio-political bloggers, Ahiruddin Attan claimed the blogs ability to influence the people’s minds depends on the bloggers credibility.
It is believed that United States president Barrack Obama won election by influencing people using new media.
June Tan and Zawawi Ibrahim (2008) assert that, Blogs have two potential roles to play in democratization. The first is to facilitate the civil liberties of society as a whole and second is to help in framing the discourse and setting the agenda for public policy-making. Those marginalized by the mainstream media have also taken to blogging as it offers them an unprecedented avenue to be heard.
Raja Petra Kamaruddin, administrator of widely-read web portal Malaysia-Today, state that his website thrived on information disclosed by informants within the ruling party because of political rivalry and infighting. Meanwhile Jeff Ooi confirms that he gets “insider” scoops from people within media organizations that they “cannot publish”.
According to University Malaya Media Department lecturer, Dr Abu Hassan Hasbullah, his research shows that 70% of the recent general election results were influence by information in political blogs.
Prominent socio-political bloggers, Ahiruddin Attan claimed the blogs ability to influence the people’s minds depends on the bloggers credibility.
This proves that the new media have made an impact in the good governance processes.
New is even more important in countries where the government controls the traditional media. Using these new techniques can actually bring about change that wouldn’t be possible only with traditional media
People not only Journalists embrace these new technologies to increase the ways in which they can tell stories, to expand the audience and to bring audiences into the process as providers of news, not just as consumers of it.
By doing that both journalists and new media takers can play greater role in holding governments accountable to the people that elected them.
People are using new media tools to hold responsible authorities accountable for their actions in countries where there in no good governance.
For example, Wael Abbas the first blogger to win our prestigious Knight International Journalism Award and others like him in Egypt have put information, including video captured on cell phones in their blogs that other media have been reluctant to report on — police brutality, election fraud and other evils.
Blog posts have had an impact, such as police officers being arrested for brutally torturing people. This might never have happened without new technology.
The danger of the new media is that everyone is trying to be the first to get information out on the web. The web tends to be a place where opinion is expressed freely, sometimes expressed very harshly. People often post some very hateful speech on the web, stuff that wouldn’t get into mainstream media.
The fact that every second mater with new media is making some journalists and media organizations to be less careful. Bad information gets out on the web. The journalist must be sure that they are maintaining the same quality control standards as before even with the pressure to be first on the web.
New media has negative impact on children. There is a significant relationship between time devoted to new media such as television, music, movies and internet on a variety of health or behavioral change on the lives of children and adolescents.
While there are many benefits of new media there are clearly disadvantages if children spend too much time with machines that generate images, and sound and not enough time with people, engaging in real relationships, exploring their physical world, playing, listening to stories and engaging in ways that stimulate them in other ways.
Findings by National Institute Health and Yale University are worrying. 83% of studies found a relationship with obesity. 88% found a relationship to sexual behaviour. 75% found a relationship to drug use. 80% found a relationship to alcohol use. 88% found a relationship to tobacco use. 69% found a relationship to ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder)
The results clearly show that there is a strong correlation between media exposure and long-term negative health and behavior effects to children.
NIH findings reveals that excessive exposure to media like television, video games and computers, can actually change the activity and ‘shape’ of the brain as well as slowing down activity
It’s important to keep stressing that new media has many benefits and that while excessive use can be a problem, it can also have benefits. For example, one interesting study at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) found that computer use for older people (aged 55-76) might even increase brain function for some.
However research proves that too much television, gaming or computer use can be harmful for children.
While there are wonderful benefits from new media, research is showing us that over-use can be harmful for children.
There is a real danger that as parents lives become more busy and complicated that we will allow new media to fill spaces that previously would have been filled by family interaction. We should not allow this to happen if we value the wellbeing of our children and the quality of the relationship that we have with them.
REFGERENCE://
Ruth Pollard Sydney Morning Herald Journalist
NPF Producer Douglas Hopper
Zambia Daily Mail Journalist Violet Nakamba Mengo
Knight Digital Media centre
http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070920niles/
International Centre for Journalists www.icfj.org
Independent Journalism Handbook: http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/journalism/index.htm
http://www.america.gov/st/texttrans-english/2008/January/20080122152242xjsnommis0.7352411.html#ixzz0KeqayTH8&D